Skip to content
s schoolsnearme.co.nz
Secondary (Year 9-15) · State

Rangitīkei College

Bredins Line, Marton · Taranaki & Manawatū

See all schools in Marton →

Total roll 305
EQI 515
Founded 1958
55

Composite score

Developing

C+

Below median

Rank #1,778 of scored NZ schools

In summary

Rangitīkei College has a shared vision articulated through its pouwhenua, providing a clear decision-making framework. Leaders prioritise cultural connection, identity, language and belonging to create an effective learning environment. The school's strategic intent aligns with the South Rangitīkei kāhui ako to ensure a community-wide response to student achievement and wellbeing.

Best suited for

Students aged 13-18 in Marton looking for a state-funded setting.

Is Rangitīkei College a good school?

Rangitīkei College scores 55/100 on the SchoolsNearMe composite — a weighted average of 5 axes (academic, outcomes, retention, wellbeing, trajectory). Below median nationally. ERO trajectory is improving across recent review cycles. The full breakdown is below; every input links to its source.

Strengths from the latest ERO report

  • A shared vision that is understood and articulated through the school's pouwhenua, providing a clear lens for decision making and ways of being
  • Alignment of strategic intent to that of the South Rangitīkei kāhui ako to better ensure a community wide response to the achievement and wellbeing of young people
  • Leaders who ensure a settled school environment that prioritises cultural connection, identity, language and belonging, to secure an effective platform for learning

Summary derived from ERO reports + audited financials + MoE records. Every claim links to its source — see data transparency at the bottom of this page.

Score breakdown

6 axes, each scored 0–100 on a national absolute scale. As at 2025.

How this is computed
Academic
35%
L1 79% · L2 71% · UE 35% · above band median (n=142) · why?
Mean of latest NCEA Level 1 + Level 2 + UE achievement percentage from Education Counts. Year: 2024. Peer comparison: above band median (n=142).
67
Outcomes
25%
Uni 6% · Te Pūkenga 2% · Industry 6% · top quartile of band (n=123) · why?
Share of leavers going to a New Zealand university + Te Pūkenga + Industry Training (capped at 100%). Counts are normalised when EC publishes raw cohort sizes instead of percentages. Source: Education Counts post-school destinations. Year: 2025. Peer comparison: top quartile of band (n=123).
14
Retention
15%
72% to Y13 · near band median (n=166) · why?
Percentage of the Y9 cohort still enrolled in Y13 (all students). Source: Education Counts retention table. Year: 2024. Peer comparison: near band median (n=166).
72
Wellbeing
12%
standdowns 3.7/1k · suspensions 6.1/1k · exclusions 3.5/1k · near band median (n=539) · why?
Composite of stand-downs, suspensions, and exclusions per 1,000 students (lower is better). Formula: standdowns/1k + 2× suspensions/1k + 5× exclusions/1k. Small primary schools with no rows score top of band ("no incidents reported"). Source: Education Counts student engagement. Year: 2024. Peer comparison: near band median (n=539).
67
Trajectory
8%
+10.1% roll over 5yr (2020→2025) · above band median (n=524) · why?
5-year change in total roll. −20% → 0 score, 0% → 50, +20% → 100. Source: Education Counts roll history. Year: 2025. Peer comparison: above band median (n=524).
63
ERO review
5%
74/100 from ERO review 2023-09 · near band median (n=544) · why?
Composite score from the most recent Education Review Office report (Haiku-extracted 0–100 from the published review text). For primary schools this is the heaviest axis (40%) because NCEA-style outcomes data isn't applicable. Source: ERO via Wayback archive. Year: 2023. Peer comparison: near band median (n=544).
74

⚠ Insufficient EQI-band peers (n<10) to compute per-axis percentile context. The score above is absolute; treat it as a single-school read rather than a peer comparison.

Real ERO composite (from the latest review): 74/100.

Latest ERO review

2023-09-22 · Shelley Booysen, ERO

ERO report
  • School has a shared vision understood through pouwhenua, providing clear decision-making lens
  • Leaders prioritise cultural connection, identity, language and belonging to secure effective learning platform
  • Strategic intent aligned with South Rangitīkei kāhui ako ensures community-wide response to achievement and wellbeing
  • Teachers increasingly offer culturally responsive learning experiences
  • School evaluating extent that learners are supported to achieve aspirations through responsive curriculum
"leaders who ensure a settled school environment that prioritises cultural connection, identity, language and belonging, to secure an effective platform for learning"
— ERO, 2023-09-22 (leadership)

Composite score across reviews

2 ERO reviews on file, 2018–2023. Click a point to read that review.

latest 74
0 25 50 75 100 20182023 2018-10-25 · 61/100 2023-09-22 · 74/100

Trajectory across review cycles

Year-over-year change per dimension based on consecutive ERO reviews.

leadership 65 → 82 (+17)

Leadership at Rangitīkei College evolved from making 'significant strategic changes to systems and programmes' (2018) to establishing a cohesive shared vision articulated through pouwhenua with explicit prioritisation of cultural connection, identity, and belonging (2023). The leadership focus sharpened from general equity and opportunity to culturally responsive and community-aligned strategic intent, with the ERO score improving from 65 to 82.

2018-10 → 2023-09 diff source

teaching 62 → 68 (+6)

Teaching improved from a focus on personalised curriculum choice ('No Limits') and collaborative teacher practices to a stronger emphasis on culturally responsive learning experiences grounded in cultural connection, identity, and belonging. The 2023 report reflects a more intentional cultural framework (pouwhenua) guiding teaching practice, whereas the 2018 report prioritised curriculum flexibility and teacher collaboration without explicit cultural emphasis.

2018-10 → 2023-09 diff source

curriculum 68 → 65 (-3)

The curriculum focus shifted from personalisation and student choice ("No Limits" curriculum emphasizing flexibility linked to interests) in 2018 to cultural responsiveness and identity-based learning in 2023. While both reports value student-centered approaches, the 2023 report prioritizes culturally responsive experiences and alignment with community kāhui ako goals, whereas 2018 emphasized individual choice and aspirations.

2018-10 → 2023-09 diff source

Audited financials

Year ended 2023 · Audit opinion: unmodified

Annual report

Total revenue

$6.25M

Surplus / (deficit)

+$552k

Net assets / equity

$3.30M

NCEA achievement

School leavers with NCEA at each level. National average is ~85% (Level 1).

Education Counts

NCEA Level 1 · 2024

79.4%

54 of 68 leavers

-1.6pt vs prior year

NCEA Level 2 · 2024

70.6%

48 of 68 leavers

+5.5pt vs prior year

University Entrance · 2024

35.3%

24 of 68 leavers

+3.6pt vs prior year

Data: Ministry of Education / Education Counts, CC-BY-4.0

Stay-on rate

Percentage of students who stay at school until at least their 17th birthday — the standard NZ proxy for Year-9-to-Year-13 retention.

Education Counts

72.1%

2024 cohort · 68 students

+2.3pt vs 2023

Discipline (age-standardised, per 1,000 students)

Stand-down = sent home temporarily. Suspension = formal investigation. Exclusion = removed from school. National averages shown for comparison.

Education Counts

Stand-downs · 2024

3.7

2 this year · NZ avg ~37

Suspensions · 2024

6.1

4 this year · NZ avg ~5

Exclusions · 2024

3.5

2 this year · NZ avg ~1.5

Vocational Pathway Awards

School leavers achieving Vocational Pathway Awards by industry sector (2024).

Education Counts
  • Construction and Infrastructure 4
  • Service Industries 2
  • Creative Industries 1

Government funding

Crown funding only (school operations + teacher salaries + property). Excludes locally-raised funds, international fees and trading income — those are in the audited financial report above.

Education Counts

Total Crown funding · 2022

$4.11M

Per-student funding · 2022

$13,461

2018

$3.8M

2019

$3.5M

2020

$4.1M

2021

$3.9M

2022

$4.1M

Roll by year level

July 2025 roll return.

Education Counts
  • Year 09
    72
  • Year 10
    70
  • Year 11
    74
  • Year 12
    67
  • Year 13+
    33

Roll by ethnicity

Share of total roll. Students who identify with multiple ethnicities are counted once.

Education Counts
  • European/Pākehā
    68.2%
  • Māori
    39.0%
  • Pacific
    11.8%
  • Asian
    7.2%
  • Other / MELAA
    1.3%

Location

Bredins Line, Marton. Nearby schools marked in grey.

Open in Google Maps →

Map tiles © OpenStreetMap, © CARTO

Loading Marton context…

Frequently asked

Is Rangitīkei College a good school?

Rangitīkei College scores 55/100 on the SchoolsNearMe composite — a weighted average of 5 axes (academic, outcomes, retention, wellbeing, trajectory). Below median nationally. ERO trajectory is improving across recent review cycles. The full breakdown is below; every input links to its source.

What does the latest ERO review say?

ERO's 2023-09 review identified 5 key findings. School has a shared vision understood through pouwhenua, providing clear decision-making lens

How do I enrol my child at Rangitīkei College?

Contact the school directly on 06-3277024, email admin@rangitikeicollege.school.nz, or visit www.rangitikeicollege.school.nz. For state schools, check your home address against the school's enrolment zone — some schools are in-zone-only.

What are the fees?

Rangitīkei College is a state school. There is no tuition fee for domestic students; voluntary donations may be requested.

What is the roll size?

Rangitīkei College has 305 students, with an EQI of 515 (higher socio-economic need).

When was the school last reviewed by ERO?

The Education Review Office last reviewed Rangitīkei College in 2023-09, signed by Shelley Booysen. 3 ERO reports are on file in our archive.

Data transparency

Every fact on this page links to its source. We never publish a claim without provenance — read our methodology for the full rules.

Last updated

31 Dec 2023

Source documents

4 cited

Spot an error?

Report a correction

Sourced from

  • ero.govt.nz
  • web.archive.org
  • schoolsdata.co.nz
  • crimestats.co.nz