Papanui High School
30 Langdons Road, Papanui · Canterbury
Composite score
Strong
Latest ERO review
2023-05-05 · Shelley Booysen, ERO
- School has identified that overall, boys achieve and engage less well than girls
- A target group of Year 9 and 10 students is at significant risk of not achieving NCEA
- School demonstrates effective gathering, analysis and use of learning and engagement information to inform curriculum programmes
- Systematic distributed leadership supports strategic priorities for improvement across curriculum design, wellbeing, and cultural responsiveness
"the school has identified that overall, its boys achieve and engage less well that its girls"
Trajectory across review cycles
Year-over-year change per dimension based on consecutive ERO reviews.
Both reports document sustained improvement in Māori student achievement at Papanui High School. The 2009 report highlighted dramatic gains (31% to 66% achieving Level 1 NCEA between 2005-2008), while the 2014 report confirms this trajectory continued with "a trend of improvement in Māori achievement over time" and notes expanded support through "a growing whānau class" alongside "notable successes in cultural competitions."
2009-05 → 2014-10 diff source
Both reports describe strong and improving student achievement, with the 2009 report emphasizing that students "exceed national expectations" by Year 11 despite entering with lower levels, while the 2014 report highlights "continuing" improvement with "significant improvement in NCEA Level 1 results in 2013." The achievement trajectory remains positive across both periods, though the 2014 report provides more recent concrete evidence of NCEA improvements.
2009-05 → 2014-10 diff source
Both reports affirm strong curriculum effectiveness, but with a shift in focus. The 2014 report emphasizes the curriculum's 'considerable flexibility and responsiveness to individual learners through wide subject options and pathways.' By 2023, the emphasis has moved toward systematic use of 'learning and engagement information to inform meaningful curriculum programmes for learner pathways,' reflecting a more data-driven approach. The 2023 report also identifies emerging concerns with boys' engagement and a target group of Year 9-10 students at risk of not achieving NCEA.
2014-10 → 2023-05 diff source
Both reports affirm high-quality teaching, but the 2014 report shifts emphasis from individual teaching practices and professional development to curriculum effectiveness and responsiveness. The 2009 report highlights "Teaching practices range from good to high quality with strong professional development driving continuous improvement," while 2014 emphasizes "The curriculum is very effective, offering considerable flexibility and responsiveness to individual learners."
2009-05 → 2014-10 diff source
Both reports emphasize wellbeing as a strength, but with a shift in focus. The 2014 report highlighted wellbeing through strong pastoral care and a caring ethos of inclusion. By 2023, while systematic distributed leadership now supports wellbeing as a strategic priority, the school has identified specific wellbeing concerns: boys achieving and engaging less well than girls, and a target group of Year 9-10 students at significant risk.
2014-10 → 2023-05 diff source
International students
SIEBA member · Day school only