Skip to content
s schoolsnearme.co.nz
Full Primary · State : Integrated

Our Lady of the Assumption School (Chch)

89 A Sparks Road, Hoon Hay · Canterbury

See all schools in Hoon Hay →

Total roll 348
EQI 401
Founded 1957
84

Composite score

Strong

A

Top 10% in NZ

Rank #222 of scored NZ schools

In summary

The school's Board Assurance Review (March 2024) found the Board had met regulatory and legislative requirements across most key areas as of June 2023. One area of non-compliance was identified regarding community consultation and health curriculum delivery statements, which the Board has since addressed. Board administration, curriculum delivery, and management of health, safety and welfare were attested to.

Best suited for

Students aged 5-11 in Hoon Hay looking for a state-funded setting with a strong recent ERO trajectory.

Is Our Lady of the Assumption School (Chch) a good school?

Our Lady of the Assumption School (Chch) scores 84/100 on the SchoolsNearMe composite — a weighted average of 5 axes (academic, outcomes, retention, wellbeing, trajectory). Top 10% in NZ nationally. ERO trajectory has declined across recent review cycles. The full breakdown is below; every input links to its source.

Strengths from the latest ERO report

  • A dedicated and committed leadership team, teachers and board that promote a positive and inclusive learning culture
  • Useful school systems and processes that identify and support the individual needs of learners
  • Ongoing professional learning that prioritises continuous improvement

Summary derived from ERO reports + audited financials + MoE records. Every claim links to its source — see data transparency at the bottom of this page.

Score breakdown

6 axes, each scored 0–100 on a national absolute scale. As at 2025.

How this is computed
Wellbeing
35%
standdowns 0.0/1k · suspensions 0.0/1k · exclusions 0.0/1k · top 10% of band (n=536) · why?
Composite of stand-downs, suspensions, and exclusions per 1,000 students (lower is better). Formula: standdowns/1k + 2× suspensions/1k + 5× exclusions/1k. Small primary schools with no rows score top of band ("no incidents reported"). Source: Education Counts student engagement. Year: 2024. Peer comparison: top 10% of band (n=536).
100
Trajectory
25%
+21.4% roll over 5yr (2020→2025) · top 10% of band (n=534) · why?
5-year change in total roll. −20% → 0 score, 0% → 50, +20% → 100. Source: Education Counts roll history. Year: 2025. Peer comparison: top 10% of band (n=534).
77
ERO review
40%
74/100 from ERO review 2020-05 · bottom quartile of band (n=539) · why?
Composite score from the most recent Education Review Office report (Haiku-extracted 0–100 from the published review text). For primary schools this is the heaviest axis (40%) because NCEA-style outcomes data isn't applicable. Source: ERO via Wayback archive. Year: 2020. Peer comparison: bottom quartile of band (n=539).
74

⚠ Insufficient EQI-band peers (n<10) to compute per-axis percentile context. The score above is absolute; treat it as a single-school read rather than a peer comparison.

Real ERO composite (from the latest review): 74/100.

Latest ERO review

2024-03-22 · Shelley Booysen, ERO

ERO report
  • School has identified the need for improved achievement in mathematics and to increase equity for some learners
  • A dedicated and committed leadership team, teachers and board promote a positive and inclusive learning culture
  • Useful school systems and processes identify and support the individual needs of learners
  • Ongoing professional learning prioritises continuous improvement
"A dedicated and committed leadership team, teachers and board that promote a positive and inclusive learning culture."
— ERO, 2024-03-22 (leadership)

Composite score across reviews

2 ERO reviews on file, 2016–2020. Click a point to read that review.

latest 74
0 25 50 75 100 20162020 2016-09-22 · 80/100 2020-05-01 · 74/100

Trajectory across review cycles

Year-over-year change per dimension based on consecutive ERO reviews.

equity 80 → 65 (-15)

Equity outcomes declined significantly between 2016 and 2020. In 2016, the school was 'responding well to Māori children whose learning and achievement need acceleration' with a score of 80. By 2020, despite overall success for most students, the score dropped to 65 and ERO identified 'Disparity in reading and mathematics outcomes for Māori and Pacific learners since 2016' and noted the school 'is not yet effectively accelerating learning for all Māori and Pacific students who need this.'

2016-09 → 2020-05 diff source

achievement maori 70 → 58 (-12)

Achievement for Māori learners declined between 2016 and 2020. The 2016 report noted the school was 'responding well to Māori children whose learning and achievement need acceleration,' while the 2020 report identified a 'disparity in reading and mathematics outcomes for Māori and Pacific learners since 2016' and stated the school 'is not yet effectively accelerating learning for all Māori and Pacific students who need this.' The 2020 report also flagged the need to 'strengthen culturally responsive practices and ensure te ao Māori is visible and sustained.'

2016-09 → 2020-05 diff source

achievement overall 70 → 82 (+12)

Overall achievement improved from a score of 70 to 82, with the 2020 report confirming the school is 'successful in achieving equitable and excellent outcomes for a large majority of students.' However, a new concern emerged: despite this progress, a 'disparity in reading and mathematics outcomes for Māori and Pacific learners' has developed since 2016, indicating inequitable progress across student groups.

2016-09 → 2020-05 diff source

curriculum 85 → 82 (-3)

Both reports affirm the school's strong curriculum reflecting vision and values, but the 2020 report reveals emerging concerns about equity gaps for Māori and Pacific learners and calls for strengthened culturally responsive practices. The 2016 report praised the school's response to Māori children's learning acceleration, while 2020 notes disparity in outcomes and that acceleration is "not yet effectively" reaching all Māori and Pacific students needing it.

2016-09 → 2020-05 diff source

leadership 85 → 85 (0)

Both reports rate leadership as well placed with consistent overall scores. The 2016 report emphasizes leaders' capacity to 'achieve and sustain equitable and excellent outcomes for all children,' while the 2020 report refines this to highlight leadership's 'strong focus on student and staff wellbeing and learning' with a 'considered, research-informed and well-paced approach to change,' suggesting a more deliberate and measured leadership approach to addressing emerging equity gaps.

2016-09 → 2020-05 diff source

Audited financials

Year ended 2022 · Audit opinion: unmodified

Annual report

Total revenue

$2.24M

Surplus / (deficit)

$40k

Net assets / equity

$0.70M

Discipline (age-standardised, per 1,000 students)

Stand-down = sent home temporarily. Suspension = formal investigation. Exclusion = removed from school. National averages shown for comparison.

Education Counts

Stand-downs · 2024

0.0

· NZ avg ~37

Suspensions · 2024

0.0

· NZ avg ~5

Exclusions · 2024

0.0

· NZ avg ~1.5

Government funding

Crown funding only (school operations + teacher salaries + property). Excludes locally-raised funds, international fees and trading income — those are in the audited financial report above.

Education Counts

Total Crown funding · 2022

$1.84M

Per-student funding · 2022

$5,283

2018

$1.6M

2019

$1.7M

2020

$1.8M

2021

$1.8M

2022

$1.8M

Roll by year level

July 2025 roll return.

Education Counts
  • Year 01
    42
  • Year 02
    45
  • Year 03
    38
  • Year 04
    36
  • Year 05
    54
  • Year 06
    27
  • Year 07
    55
  • Year 08
    38

Roll by ethnicity

Share of total roll. Students who identify with multiple ethnicities are counted once.

Education Counts
  • European/Pākehā
    72.1%
  • Asian
    27.6%
  • Māori
    11.2%
  • Pacific
    4.6%
  • Other / MELAA
    4.6%

Location

89 A Sparks Road, Hoon Hay. Nearby schools marked in grey.

Open in Google Maps →

Map tiles © OpenStreetMap, © CARTO

Loading Hoon Hay context…

Frequently asked

Is Our Lady of the Assumption School (Chch) a good school?

Our Lady of the Assumption School (Chch) scores 84/100 on the SchoolsNearMe composite — a weighted average of 5 axes (academic, outcomes, retention, wellbeing, trajectory). Top 10% in NZ nationally. ERO trajectory has declined across recent review cycles. The full breakdown is below; every input links to its source.

What does the latest ERO review say?

ERO's 2024-03 review identified 4 key findings. School has identified the need for improved achievement in mathematics and to increase equity for some learners

How do I enrol my child at Our Lady of the Assumption School (Chch)?

Contact the school directly on 03-3389503, email admin@ola.school.nz, or visit www.ola.school.nz. For state schools, check your home address against the school's enrolment zone — some schools are in-zone-only.

What are the fees?

Our Lady of the Assumption School (Chch) is a state school. There is no tuition fee for domestic students; voluntary donations may be requested.

What is the roll size?

Our Lady of the Assumption School (Chch) has 348 students, with an EQI of 401 (lower socio-economic need).

When was the school last reviewed by ERO?

The Education Review Office last reviewed Our Lady of the Assumption School (Chch) in 2024-03, signed by Shelley Booysen. 4 ERO reports are on file in our archive.

Data transparency

Every fact on this page links to its source. We never publish a claim without provenance — read our methodology for the full rules.

Last updated

22 Mar 2024

Source documents

4 cited

Spot an error?

Report a correction

Sourced from

  • ero.govt.nz
  • ola.school.nz
  • schoolsdata.co.nz
  • crimestats.co.nz