Skip to content
s schoolsnearme.co.nz
Secondary (Year 9-15) · State

Mt Roskill Grammar

Frost Road, Mount Roskill · Auckland — Central

See all schools in Mount Roskill →

Total roll 1,863
EQI 444
Founded 1953
66

Composite score

Established

B

Below median

Rank #1,313 of scored NZ schools

Top 25% in Stay-on rate

In summary

Mt Roskill Grammar's 2023 ERO review found effective internal evaluation practices and leadership through the Collaborative Complex Problem-Solving model. The school has a professional learning community committed to equitable outcomes, with teachers actively engaging in professional inquiry focused on assessment for learning. No composite score is currently available for this school.

Best suited for

Students aged 13-18 in Mount Roskill looking for a state-funded setting with an established ERO profile.

Is Mt Roskill Grammar a good school?

Mt Roskill Grammar scores 66/100 on the SchoolsNearMe composite — a weighted average of 5 axes (academic, outcomes, retention, wellbeing, trajectory). Below median nationally. ERO trajectory is improving across recent review cycles. The full breakdown is below; every input links to its source.

Strengths from the latest ERO report

  • Effective internal evaluation practices and capability, including leadership through the CCPS model
  • A professional learning community who are committed to achieving equitable outcomes for all students
  • Teachers who proactively engage in professional inquiry processes, focused on assessment for learning and continually strengthening their practice

Summary derived from ERO reports + audited financials + MoE records. Every claim links to its source — see data transparency at the bottom of this page.

Score breakdown

6 axes, each scored 0–100 on a national absolute scale. As at 2025.

How this is computed
Academic
35%
L1 91% · L2 85% · UE 56% · near band median (n=81) · why?
Mean of latest NCEA Level 1 + Level 2 + UE achievement percentage from Education Counts. Year: 2024. Peer comparison: near band median (n=81).
82
Outcomes
25%
Uni 47% · Te Pūkenga 8% · Industry 2% · above band median (n=77) · why?
Share of leavers going to a New Zealand university + Te Pūkenga + Industry Training (capped at 100%). Counts are normalised when EC publishes raw cohort sizes instead of percentages. Source: Education Counts post-school destinations. Year: 2025. Peer comparison: above band median (n=77).
56
Retention
15%
91% to Y13 · top quartile of band (n=84) · why?
Percentage of the Y9 cohort still enrolled in Y13 (all students). Source: Education Counts retention table. Year: 2024. Peer comparison: top quartile of band (n=84).
91
Wellbeing
12%
standdowns 71.7/1k · suspensions 2.7/1k · exclusions 1.6/1k · bottom quartile of band (n=518) · why?
Composite of stand-downs, suspensions, and exclusions per 1,000 students (lower is better). Formula: standdowns/1k + 2× suspensions/1k + 5× exclusions/1k. Small primary schools with no rows score top of band ("no incidents reported"). Source: Education Counts student engagement. Year: 2024. Peer comparison: bottom quartile of band (n=518).
15
Trajectory
8%
-4.3% roll over 5yr (2020→2025) · below band median (n=515) · why?
5-year change in total roll. −20% → 0 score, 0% → 50, +20% → 100. Source: Education Counts roll history. Year: 2025. Peer comparison: below band median (n=515).
45
ERO review
5%
83/100 from ERO review 2015-06 · above band median (n=520) · why?
Composite score from the most recent Education Review Office report (Haiku-extracted 0–100 from the published review text). For primary schools this is the heaviest axis (40%) because NCEA-style outcomes data isn't applicable. Source: ERO via Wayback archive. Year: 2015. Peer comparison: above band median (n=520).
83

⚠ Insufficient EQI-band peers (n<10) to compute per-axis percentile context. The score above is absolute; treat it as a single-school read rather than a peer comparison.

Real ERO composite (from the latest review): 83/100.

Latest ERO review

2023-05-17 · Shelley Booysen, ERO

ERO report
  • School has effective internal evaluation practices and capability, including leadership through the Collaborative Complex Problem-Solving model
  • Professional learning community committed to achieving equitable outcomes for all students
  • Teachers proactively engage in professional inquiry processes focused on assessment for learning
  • School continues to build equitable and excellent outcomes in NCEA and Scholarship
  • Review of year 9 and 10 curriculum aimed at achieving more equitable achievement outcomes in literacy and numeracy
"effective internal evaluation practices and capability, including leadership through the CCPS model"
— ERO, 2023-05-17 (leadership)

Composite score across reviews

2 ERO reviews on file, 2010–2015. Click a point to read that review.

latest 83
0 25 50 75 100 20102015 2010-10-08 · 77/100 2015-06-22 · 83/100

Trajectory across review cycles

Year-over-year change per dimension based on consecutive ERO reviews.

achievement pasifika 50 → 82 (+32)

Pacific student achievement improved significantly between 2010 and 2015. The 2010 report noted 'a generally increasing trend in achievement for Māori and Pacific students at Levels 1 to 3,' while the 2015 report highlighted 'significant improvement of Māori and Pacific students at Levels 1 and 2' as a point of pride, indicating sustained and accelerated progress.

2010-10 → 2015-06 diff source

equity 65 → 80 (+15)

Mt Roskill Grammar demonstrated significant progress on equity between 2010 and 2015. The 2010 report noted 'generally increasing trend in achievement for Māori and Pacific students' and 'positive progress in Māori student achievement,' while the 2015 report reported 'significant improvement of Māori and Pacific students at Levels 1 and 2' and emphasized 'very culturally diverse student community with strong outcomes for all student groups.' The school also introduced culturally responsive teaching initiatives by 2015, moving from strategic initiatives to embedded practice across the campus.

2010-10 → 2015-06 diff source

achievement overall 90 → 82 (-8)

Mt Roskill Grammar maintained strong overall NCEA achievement between 2010 and 2015, with both reports highlighting performance at or above national levels. However, the 2015 report shows a notable shift in emphasis toward inclusive outcomes across all student groups, particularly emphasizing 'significant improvement of Māori and Pacific students at Levels 1 and 2' rather than the earlier focus on above-average results overall. The ERO score declined from 90 to 82, suggesting some consolidation or adjustment in overall performance assessment.

2010-10 → 2015-06 diff source

achievement maori 72 → 80 (+8)

Mt Roskill Grammar demonstrated sustained and accelerating improvement in Māori achievement between 2010 and 2015. The 2010 report noted that 'Māori students in the school achieve better than Māori students nationally and that their achievement is improving over time,' while the 2015 report highlighted 'significant improvement of Māori and Pacific students at Levels 1 and 2' and attributed this to 'improved relationships with whānau that support Māori students across the campus.' The school progressed from gaining momentum to achieving demonstrable results.

2010-10 → 2015-06 diff source

leadership 85 → 85 (0)

Both reports rate leadership positively, but there is a notable evolution in structure and approach. The 2010 report praised the principal and senior leadership team for 'managing change in an effective and consultative manner.' By 2015, the school had implemented 'a new leadership structure' that 'allows school leaders to work collaboratively,' suggesting a shift from principal-centered leadership to a more distributed model, while the principal 'continues to provide professional leadership.'

2010-10 → 2015-06 diff source

Audited financials

Year ended 2022 · Audit opinion: unmodified

Annual report

Total revenue

$24.07M

Surplus / (deficit)

+$598k

Net assets / equity

$10.05M

NCEA achievement

School leavers with NCEA at each level. National average is ~85% (Level 1).

Education Counts

NCEA Level 1 · 2024

91.4%

363 of 397 leavers

+4.1pt vs prior year

NCEA Level 2 · 2024

85.4%

339 of 397 leavers

+8.5pt vs prior year

University Entrance · 2024

55.9%

222 of 397 leavers

-0.7pt vs prior year

Data: Ministry of Education / Education Counts, CC-BY-4.0

Stay-on rate

Percentage of students who stay at school until at least their 17th birthday — the standard NZ proxy for Year-9-to-Year-13 retention.

Education Counts

91.2%

2024 cohort · 397 students

+3.9pt vs 2023

Discipline (age-standardised, per 1,000 students)

Stand-down = sent home temporarily. Suspension = formal investigation. Exclusion = removed from school. National averages shown for comparison.

Education Counts

Stand-downs · 2024

71.7

193 this year · NZ avg ~37

Suspensions · 2024

2.7

9 this year · NZ avg ~5

Exclusions · 2024

1.6

4 this year · NZ avg ~1.5

Vocational Pathway Awards

School leavers achieving Vocational Pathway Awards by industry sector (2024).

Education Counts
  • Service Industries 33
  • Creative Industries 8
  • Social and Community Services 1

Government funding

Crown funding only (school operations + teacher salaries + property). Excludes locally-raised funds, international fees and trading income — those are in the audited financial report above.

Education Counts

Total Crown funding · 2022

$21.28M

Per-student funding · 2022

$11,423

2018

$14.6M

2019

$14.6M

2020

$16.7M

2021

$17.8M

2022

$21.3M

Roll by year level

July 2025 roll return.

Education Counts
  • Year 09
    397
  • Year 10
    354
  • Year 11
    380
  • Year 12
    369
  • Year 13+
    358

Roll by ethnicity

Share of total roll. Students who identify with multiple ethnicities are counted once.

Education Counts
  • Asian
    54.5%
  • Pacific
    25.9%
  • European/Pākehā
    15.6%
  • Other / MELAA
    9.8%
  • Māori
    7.9%
  • International
    3.0%

International students

SIEBA member · Day school only

ESOL support

partial

Location

Frost Road, Mount Roskill. Nearby schools marked in grey.

Open in Google Maps →

Map tiles © OpenStreetMap, © CARTO

Loading Mount Roskill context…

Frequently asked

Is Mt Roskill Grammar a good school?

Mt Roskill Grammar scores 66/100 on the SchoolsNearMe composite — a weighted average of 5 axes (academic, outcomes, retention, wellbeing, trajectory). Below median nationally. ERO trajectory is improving across recent review cycles. The full breakdown is below; every input links to its source.

What does the latest ERO review say?

ERO's 2023-05 review identified 5 key findings. School has effective internal evaluation practices and capability, including leadership through the Collaborative Complex Problem-Solving model

How do I enrol my child at Mt Roskill Grammar?

Contact the school directly on 09-6210050, email admin@mrgs.school.nz, or visit www.mrgs.school.nz. For state schools, check your home address against the school's enrolment zone — some schools are in-zone-only.

What are the fees?

Mt Roskill Grammar is a state school. There is no tuition fee for domestic students; voluntary donations may be requested.

What is the roll size?

Mt Roskill Grammar has 1,863 students, with an EQI of 444 (mid-range socio-economic context).

When was the school last reviewed by ERO?

The Education Review Office last reviewed Mt Roskill Grammar in 2023-05, signed by Shelley Booysen. 5 ERO reports are on file in our archive.

Data transparency

Every fact on this page links to its source. We never publish a claim without provenance — read our methodology for the full rules.

Last updated

17 May 2023

Source documents

5 cited

Spot an error?

Report a correction

Sourced from

  • ero.govt.nz
  • mrgs.school.nz
  • sieba.nz
  • schoolsdata.co.nz
  • crimestats.co.nz