Skip to content
s schoolsnearme.co.nz
Secondary (Year 9-15) · State

Central Southland College

174 MacKenzie Street, Winton · Otago & Southland

Total roll 634
EQI 462
Founded 1965
69

Composite score

Established

B

Above median

Rank #1,183 of scored NZ schools

Best suited for

Students aged 13-18 in Winton looking for a state-funded setting with an established ERO profile.

Is Central Southland College a good school?

Central Southland College scores 69/100 on the SchoolsNearMe composite — a weighted average of 5 axes (academic, outcomes, retention, wellbeing, trajectory). Above median nationally. ERO trajectory is improving across recent review cycles. The full breakdown is below; every input links to its source.

Strengths from the latest ERO report

  • Board has attested compliance across all regulatory and legislative requirement areas

Summary derived from ERO reports + audited financials + MoE records. Every claim links to its source — see data transparency at the bottom of this page.

Score breakdown

6 axes, each scored 0–100 on a national absolute scale. As at 2025.

How this is computed
Academic
35%
L1 81% · L2 75% · UE 33% · below band median (n=84) · why?
Mean of latest NCEA Level 1 + Level 2 + UE achievement percentage from Education Counts. Year: 2024. Peer comparison: below band median (n=84).
69
Outcomes
25%
Uni 13% · Te Pūkenga 17% · Industry 22% · top quartile of band (n=81) · why?
Share of leavers going to a New Zealand university + Te Pūkenga + Industry Training (capped at 100%). Counts are normalised when EC publishes raw cohort sizes instead of percentages. Source: Education Counts post-school destinations. Year: 2025. Peer comparison: top quartile of band (n=81).
52
Retention
15%
78% to Y13 · near band median (n=86) · why?
Percentage of the Y9 cohort still enrolled in Y13 (all students). Source: Education Counts retention table. Year: 2024. Peer comparison: near band median (n=86).
78
Wellbeing
12%
standdowns 10.2/1k · suspensions 1.7/1k · exclusions 0.0/1k · above band median (n=404) · why?
Composite of stand-downs, suspensions, and exclusions per 1,000 students (lower is better). Formula: standdowns/1k + 2× suspensions/1k + 5× exclusions/1k. Small primary schools with no rows score top of band ("no incidents reported"). Source: Education Counts student engagement. Year: 2024. Peer comparison: above band median (n=404).
86
Trajectory
8%
+18.7% roll over 5yr (2020→2025) · top quartile of band (n=403) · why?
5-year change in total roll. −20% → 0 score, 0% → 50, +20% → 100. Source: Education Counts roll history. Year: 2025. Peer comparison: top quartile of band (n=403).
73
ERO review
5%
79/100 from ERO review 2019-08 · above band median (n=406) · why?
Composite score from the most recent Education Review Office report (Haiku-extracted 0–100 from the published review text). For primary schools this is the heaviest axis (40%) because NCEA-style outcomes data isn't applicable. Source: ERO via Wayback archive. Year: 2019. Peer comparison: above band median (n=406).
79

⚠ Insufficient EQI-band peers (n<10) to compute per-axis percentile context. The score above is absolute; treat it as a single-school read rather than a peer comparison.

Real ERO composite (from the latest review): 79/100.

Latest ERO review

2023-06-13 · Shelley Booysen, ERO

ERO report
  • Board has attested to meeting regulatory and legislative requirements as of December 2022
  • Board Administration requirements confirmed
  • Curriculum requirements confirmed
  • Management of Health, Safety and Welfare requirements confirmed
  • Personnel Management requirements confirmed
"As of December 2022, the Central Southland College Board has attested to the following regulatory and legislative requirements"
— ERO, 2023-06-13 (governance)

Composite score across reviews

2 ERO reviews on file, 2015–2019. Click a point to read that review.

latest 79
0 25 50 75 100 20152019 2015-06-17 · 80/100 2019-08-21 · 79/100

Trajectory across review cycles

Year-over-year change per dimension based on consecutive ERO reviews.

curriculum 80 → 85 (+5)

Both reports affirm a rich and broad curriculum as a key strength. The 2019 report emphasizes greater differentiation, expanded te reo Māori opportunities, and digital technologies integration compared to the 2015 report, reflecting evolution toward more responsive and inclusive pathways.

2015-06 → 2019-08 diff source

achievement maori 65 → 65 (0)

The reports show a shift in focus on Māori student achievement from general cultural participation to active intervention. The 2015 report noted Māori students "experience some aspects of their identity, language and culture through kapa haka, te reo Māori courses, and whānau groups" with no specific achievement concerns mentioned. By 2019, while "increased te reo Māori opportunities" continued, the school explicitly acknowledged that "some Māori students achieve at lower levels" and implemented "targeted interventions for each individual student" with regular monitoring by leaders.

2015-06 → 2019-08 diff source

governance 85 → 85 (0)

Both reports describe strong governance with trustees well-informed and collaborative. The 2015 report emphasizes trustees using achievement information effectively to ask useful questions; the 2019 report expands on this, highlighting an experienced board with clear priorities, strategic direction, and collaborative work with the principal on goals and targets.

2015-06 → 2019-08 diff source

leadership 85 → 85 (0)

Both reports rate leadership positively, but the 2019 report provides more detailed description of leadership effectiveness. The 2015 report highlights the 'new senior leadership team' providing 'effective professional leadership,' while the 2019 report emphasizes that the 'leadership team is improvement focused and works cohesively' with an 'open-door policy' supporting positive relationships across all levels.

2015-06 → 2019-08 diff source

wellbeing 85 → 85 (0)

Both reports affirm strong pastoral care systems supporting student wellbeing. The 2015 report emphasizes "effective systems for promoting student wellbeing and achievement" with positive teacher-student relationships, while the 2019 report describes a "well-established pastoral system" with explicit attention to "diverse groups, including Māori and ESOL." The later report shows evolution toward more targeted, equity-focused wellbeing support.

2015-06 → 2019-08 diff source

Audited financials

Year ended 2021 · Audit opinion: n/a

Annual report

Total revenue

$7.34M

Surplus / (deficit)

+$293k

Net assets / equity

$1.78M

NCEA achievement

School leavers with NCEA at each level. National average is ~85% (Level 1).

Education Counts

NCEA Level 1 · 2024

80.9%

89 of 110 leavers

-8.7pt vs prior year

NCEA Level 2 · 2024

74.5%

82 of 110 leavers

-5.7pt vs prior year

University Entrance · 2024

32.7%

36 of 110 leavers

-6.0pt vs prior year

Data: Ministry of Education / Education Counts, CC-BY-4.0

Stay-on rate

Percentage of students who stay at school until at least their 17th birthday — the standard NZ proxy for Year-9-to-Year-13 retention.

Education Counts

78.2%

2024 cohort · 110 students

-3.9pt vs 2023

Discipline (age-standardised, per 1,000 students)

Stand-down = sent home temporarily. Suspension = formal investigation. Exclusion = removed from school. National averages shown for comparison.

Education Counts

Stand-downs · 2024

10.2

10 this year · NZ avg ~37

Suspensions · 2024

1.7

2 this year · NZ avg ~5

Exclusions · 2024

0.0

· NZ avg ~1.5

Vocational Pathway Awards

School leavers achieving Vocational Pathway Awards by industry sector (2024).

Education Counts
  • Service Industries 8
  • Creative Industries 3

Government funding

Crown funding only (school operations + teacher salaries + property). Excludes locally-raised funds, international fees and trading income — those are in the audited financial report above.

Education Counts

Total Crown funding · 2022

$6.14M

Per-student funding · 2022

$9,685

2018

$4.7M

2019

$5.1M

2020

$5.8M

2021

$7.4M

2022

$6.1M

Roll by year level

July 2025 roll return.

Education Counts
  • Year 09
    154
  • Year 10
    137
  • Year 11
    147
  • Year 12
    122
  • Year 13+
    99

Roll by ethnicity

Share of total roll. Students who identify with multiple ethnicities are counted once.

Education Counts
  • European/Pākehā
    74.6%
  • Māori
    18.3%
  • Asian
    17.2%
  • Other / MELAA
    2.1%
  • Pacific
    1.7%
  • International
    0.5%

International students

SIEBA member · Day school only

ESOL support

partial

Years accepted

9-13

Location

174 MacKenzie Street, Winton. Nearby schools marked in grey.

Open in Google Maps →

Map tiles © OpenStreetMap, © CARTO

Loading Winton context…

Frequently asked

Is Central Southland College a good school?

Central Southland College scores 69/100 on the SchoolsNearMe composite — a weighted average of 5 axes (academic, outcomes, retention, wellbeing, trajectory). Above median nationally. ERO trajectory is improving across recent review cycles. The full breakdown is below; every input links to its source.

What does the latest ERO review say?

ERO's 2023-06 review identified 6 key findings. Board has attested to meeting regulatory and legislative requirements as of December 2022

How do I enrol my child at Central Southland College?

Contact the school directly on 03-2367646, email office@csc.school.nz, or visit www.csc.school.nz. For state schools, check your home address against the school's enrolment zone — some schools are in-zone-only.

What are the fees?

Central Southland College is a state school. There is no tuition fee for domestic students; voluntary donations may be requested.

What is the roll size?

Central Southland College has 634 students, with an EQI of 462 (mid-range socio-economic context).

When was the school last reviewed by ERO?

The Education Review Office last reviewed Central Southland College in 2023-06, signed by Shelley Booysen. 5 ERO reports are on file in our archive.

Data transparency

Every fact on this page links to its source. We never publish a claim without provenance — read our methodology for the full rules.

Last updated

13 Jun 2023

Source documents

5 cited

Spot an error?

Report a correction

Sourced from

  • ero.govt.nz
  • csc.school.nz
  • sieba.nz
  • schoolsdata.co.nz
  • crimestats.co.nz